Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Angus Grundy's avatar

Your diagnosis of the problem seems spot on as usual, Jim. And the idea of unions being good for business is a good one. And old Henry Ford recognized the benefits of paying his workers enough that they could afford his cars over a century ago.

On tomorrow's super-rich's offspring not being productive there's Leah Hunt-Hendrix (from Hunt Oil money) who's helping turn her cohort towards philanthropy (featured in the New Yorker, Aug 7, 2023). But the idea of the rich trying to solve problems without rocking the boat that got them there is skewered by Anand Giridharadas's excellent polemical book 'Winners Take All'.

What we need, according to Kate Raworth in her brilliant 'Doughnut Economics', is to have a strong social foundation while protecting the ecological ceiling (so everyone is 'inside the doughnut') in order to create 'human prosperity in a flourishing web of life', to use her one-liner. And for that, she argues, we need to finally reassess the basic economic mantra of 'growth' as the engine of change and realise that it can't go on forever and that every country is on an S-curve, just at different points.

Expand full comment

No posts